Hi Dwayne,
here is the complete coding of the R16 approach via the UYJOR transition:
APPCH:010,A,R16,UYJOR,UYJOR,K3,P,C,E A, , ,IF, , , , , , , , , , ,-,06000, ,18000, , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
APPCH:020,A,R16,UYJOR,UYJOR,K3,P,C,EE H,R, ,HF, , , , , , , , ,1690,0050,+,03400, , , , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
APPCH:010,R,R16, ,UYJOR,K3,P,C,E I, , ,IF, , , , , , , , , , ,+,03400, ,18000, , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
APPCH:020,R,R16, ,XUMYI,K3,P,C,E F, , ,TF, , , , , , , , ,1690,0061,+,02900, , , , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
PRDAT:A, LPV,A, LNAV/VNAV,A, LNAV, , , , , , , , ,J,S;
APPCH:030,R,R16, ,RW16,K3,P,G,GY M, , ,TF, , , , , , , , ,1690,0048, ,01347, , , , ,-300, , , , , , ,A,J,S;
APPCH:040,R,R16, , , , , , M , , ,CA, , , , , , , , ,1690, ,+,01569, , , , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
APPCH:050,R,R16, ,OHYEQ,K3,P,C,EY , , ,DF, , , , , , , , , , ,+,03400, , , , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
APPCH:060,R,R16, ,OHYEQ,K3,P,C,EE H,R, ,HM, , , , , , , , ,3490,0050, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,A,J,S;
You see in the A-records/transition records (the first two lines):
the IF (Initial fix) leg UYJOR and after that HF (holding in lieu of procedure turn) via UYJOR
In R-records/final records (all following lines):
the first leg is also the IF (Initial fix) UYJOR → XUMYI → and so on …
Thats what we offer in our data, in the X-Plane11 data - I´m no real pilot, nor do I know exactly how the G1000 handle this in real-life and if this is wrong or right, sorry. Only from the coding point of view, I can´t see any error, with or without using the transition (course reversal) - you see in both cases UYJOR as initial fix.
Cheers,
Richard