RealTraffic integration as an additional traffic data source

With the new capability of showing VATSIM and IVAO traffic in the Navigraph app, many FlyRealTraffic users have asked for showing RealTraffic data as an additional data source. This would allow display of real world air traffic from www.flyrealtraffic.com in the Navigraph app.

Navigraph support have indicated they would consider this if a sufficient number of votes are received. So please go ahead and click the “Vote” button above if you would like to see this in the future!

oui cela serais excellent merci

Voted, would love to see this!!

Absolutely a big YES, will be fantastic.

It would be amazing to have RealTraffic on Navigraph! I voted (user Navigraph Unlimited).

A very good idea and above all consistent for those who fly with live traffic.

It`s also a wish from my side

regards Peter

I think this a very good idea

I concur completely. Seriously important addition to connect RealTraffic, just as it already is with the others. Tony

I voted, this would be a welcome addition!

We really need this!

Certamente SI!! Sarebbe fantastico. Grazie

very good idea !! would support the integration

That is a good suggestion!

Oui, une très bonne idée ! :+1:

When are you loading in real traffic data flows as a new feature? I - and I expect many others - would like that very much instead of VATSIM and IVAO.

Look at here:

Cheers
Richard

Don’t forget to vote for this at the top of this thread. Navigraph haven’t yet agreed to implement this and need to see a large number of votes for this to make a case.

Wouldn’t the colleagues of Flightaware not be a better source to source the real traffic data from?

Technically, any service that provides real time air traffic data would work. But FlyRealTraffic.com is the only service providing real-time and historical air traffic in a form that can be used for injection into your flight simulators. It’s of course ideal if the traffic in your sim matches that in Navigraph. In addition to that, flyrealtraffic.com’s coverage is generally more complete than flightaware’s (or flightradar24’s for that matter).