Hi,
these are not waypoint from us because we don´t have these waypoints in our source. I guess, these waypoint will be created by LittleNavMap due the leg-path but I´m not sure, from where these waypoints are. What I only can say is, not from us, sorry!
No problem - I hadn´t the feeling that you want to blame us … it was a normal, valid question - so no need to apologize you. I guess, LNM generate the ident-names by itself because normally such leg-paths doesn´t have any name - the waypoint-ident is empty in this cases. Possible that LNM needs such names and therefore, the program generates these names.
ML+2, ML+3, … is also not valid in the ARINC424 standard … sorry but thanks for your feedback.