Thanks Richard, this is consistent with what you had told Frailis Marco <here> so no surprise. Thankfully this type of approach is rather uncommon these days. It just happened to be one of the first arrivals I tried to pull to learn how to use Navigraph yesterday. Tough luck !
For my education though, in the other thread you refer to ARINC424, which until now I didn’t know what it was so I had a look. Found <this>.
What I’m not clear is, is the inability to code a restriction specific to Navigraph, or everyone including - real life - airlines ? Because a number of airlines (HK Express for which Frailis Marco is flying for, EVA Air, Japan Airlines, Air Canada, China Airlines, ANA, Vietnam Airlines, Mandarin, CX etc the list is endless) are flying to RCKH and they can’t all have problems coding this particular arrival and rely on legacy coding from a time when the DME was linked to another, ARINC 424 capable, beacon, correct ? Or do pilots requested to fly this arrival have to declare to the controller that they are unable to fly it because… it couldn’t be coded in their FMS 
?..
What I’m saying is, I presume if the Taiwanese civil aviation publishes this arrival, is that it can be… used. Do you happen to know the real-life mechanisms that allow airlines to actually fly it ?
EDIT: I have another question. Does this mean that Jappensen has no chart for this Arrival ?
EDTI 2: But then Frailis Marco says he has this Arrival in his real plane so obviously he must have the chart too… I would think…