Issue with SID GAXUN1B at SPZO – Missing RF Leg

Hi,
Here, is our XP12 data (what we offer) part for the GAXUN1B departure at SPZO:

SID:010,5,GAXU1B,RW10,RW10,SP,P,G,G   , ,302,IF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    , ,     ,     ,18000, ,   ,    ,   ,SPZO,SP,P,A, , , , ;
SID:020,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO536,SP,P,C,E   , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,12000,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;
SID:030,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO540,SP,P,C,E   ,R,302,RF, , , , , ,004000,    ,    ,    ,0014,+,13000,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   ,RZO18,SP,P,C, , , , ;
SID:040,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO544,SP,P,C,E   , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,13500,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;
SID:050,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO548,SP,P,C,E   ,L,302,RF, , , , , ,006000,    ,    ,    ,0007,+,14000,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   ,RZO62,SP,P,C, , , , ;
SID:060,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO552,SP,P,C,E   , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,14700,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;
SID:070,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO802,SP,P,C,E   , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,15000,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;
SID:080,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO804,SP,P,C,E   ,L,302,RF, , , , , ,002600,    ,    ,    ,0084,+,17500,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   ,RZO81,SP,P,C, , , , ;
SID:090,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO806,SP,P,C,E   , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,18000,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;
SID:100,5,GAXU1B,RW10,ZO808,SP,P,C,E   , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,FL220,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;
SID:110,5,GAXU1B,RW10,GAXUN,SP,E,A,EE  , ,302,TF, , , , , ,      ,    ,    ,    ,    ,+,FL250,     ,     , ,   ,    ,   , , , , , , , , ;

In segment 080, you see the RF leg to ZO804, which means from the previous waypoint ZO802 → ZO804. When you compare it with the charts, it´s coded correctly. So, it must be another issue, is not a navdata issue, as I have written before.

Cheers,
Richard