Hello everyone, I recently bought a navigraph ultimated subscription and immediately went to install the new AIRAC 2506. Everything seemed to be installed, the points on the map and in MCDU were updated (I only use a regular AIRBUS A320 neo aircraft from ASOBO), but a problem appeared. 1 problem is related to the fact that MCDU simply does not configure the airport exit scheme. They seem to be in MCDU, but for some reason they are not added to the map. 2 problem is also related to MCDU. When I select a runway and an approach scheme, MCDU for some reason selects a scheme that does not exist at all according to data from NAVIGRAPH CHARTS. I really ask for help since these problems significantly spoil the gameplay, especially in the VATSIM network where I usually fly. for information: flight simulator MSFS2020
Hi,
First welcome at Navigraph
Thanks for your report, but can you give us an example of which airport and which STAR or approach for which runway you´re trying to find so we can try to reproduce it?
Thank you very much,
Richard
PS: It is highly recommended that such cases be tested with the C172 and the G1000 first because not all stock aircraft support the newest WT framework, which the G1000 does.
Thank you for responding so quickly, I won’t say anything about the exit plan, just because it isn’t added to the map or the flight plan. yesterday I flew to Novosibirsk runway 25 ILS approach GOLI1K and I will attach a photo of how the plane led me on this approach. I marked the current entry in yellow and how MCDU led me in red.
P.S. I drew by hand an approximate diagram of the approach to runway 25, so forgive me if it is not accurate.
I also saw other plugins in Navigraph hub, something on G, but I still don’t understand what it is(
WHO THE HECK ARE YOU AND HOW ARE YOU IN MY ACCOUNT!?, THIS MESSAGE WAS NOT SENT BY ME. I AM SECURING MY ACCOUNT RIGHT NOW! Please stop hacking.
Hi again,
I hope you have successfully changed your password (or email) to avoid someone hacking you …
I have tried your example in the stock C172 with the G1000, and the procedure looks good compared to our charts.
… and also the stock A320neo v2 shows the correct path:
Here is the legs page of the A320neo v2:
You see, the path is correct, as are the waypoint sequences. Sorry, but I can´t reproduce it, and I don´t see any issue here. Maybe you have selected the wrong STAR?
Cheers,
Richard
This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.