Hi,
traffic icons shall take higher (later) drawing priority than other information like routes, otherwise it might disappear completely depending on zoom level:
Best regards,
Daniel
100% agree. And not sure of in which mode but for instance in STAR of SID charts the traffic becomes almost invisible.
Hello! Thank you for the feedback!
Could you elaborate on why the network traffic is more critical than your route details? Currently, the traffic is intentionally drawn under the route, and the same goes for ATC features. Would it not be worse if the route was covered by traffic?
Thank you for your input!
Kind Regards,
Malte
Well, I very seldom care about route details on the Charts map (ATS route designators etc.). Those might have been more relevant in flight route planning phase (althought this is nowadays very seldom a manual process), but certainly not when using the Charts application as a moving map in flight, where I mostly care about roughly where I am on the route (enroute, terminal phases are charts), and what other flights are possibly conflicting. Other aircraft hidden below fat route lines are exactly what I do not need then, especially when they are on the same routing like me.
So for me, traffic should clearly drawn ontop route lines. ATC probably too (not sector boundaries - which should be lower than route lines etc, but station tags).
Best regards,
Daniel
Thank you for the feedback guys,
We are looking into how to make this better overall.
Kind regards,
Markus