KPDX.TMBRS2.28L Repeated waypoint, incorrect sequencing

Looks like WP FLOWR on the TMBRS2 for ILS28L is repeated on the Navdata

[TMBRS2.28L.0]
Leg=IF
Name=TMBRS
Latitude=44.800369
Longitude=-122.688508
Speed=270
Altitude=11000A
[TMBRS2.28L.1]
Leg=TF
Name=VANTZ
Latitude=44.966656
Longitude=-122.671758
Speed=250
Altitude=11000A15000B
[TMBRS2.28L.2]
Leg=TF
Name=FLOWR
Latitude=45.249222
Longitude=-122.642997
Altitude=7000A9000B
[TMBRS2.28L.3]
Leg=IF
Name=FLOWR
Latitude=45.249222
Longitude=-122.642997
Altitude=7000A9000B
[TMBRS2.28L.4]
Leg=TF
Name=WIDMR
Latitude=45.395983
Longitude=-122.511114
Speed=210
Altitude=5000
[TMBRS2.28L.5]
Leg=TF
Name=ROAGE
Latitude=45.443425
Longitude=-122.468344
[TMBRS2.28L.6]
Leg=TF
Name=ICEAX
Latitude=45.410847
Longitude=-122.381517
CrossThisPoint=1
[TMBRS2.28L.7]
Leg=FM
Name=ICEAX
Latitude=45.410847
Longitude=-122.381517
Heading=103.0
Frequency=CVO
NavBear=17.1
NavDist=67.1

This is on all of the TMBRS2 arrivals, for what it’s worth.

Hi,
It´s not double, the STAR has two parts. One main part ends at FOWR, and one transition part starts at FOWR. You see this very well in the leg path type. TF (terminal fix) FLOWR is the end fix for the STAR, and IF (initial fix) FLOWR is the starting point for the transition.

What issue do you exactly have with these “double” waypoints? I can´t see any issue nor any wrong sequence anywhere.

Cheers
Richard


Screenshot 2024-10-11 163002

As you can see here, the add-on in question flew past VANTZ towards FLOWR. I’m just trying to make sure this isn’t a Navdata issue before I go to the add-on developer.

Sorry, but what is incorrect here? The segment VANTZ → FLOWR is correct so far … What is wrong here?

Here from the charts:

Cheers,
Richard

You notice the aircraft hasn’t overflown VANTZ, correct? Based on the ND range, we’re about 5nm from VANTZ. I’m just making sure this is the add-on, not the navdata.

Understood - I don´t see how far you are away from VANTZ; I only see that the active waypoint is FLOWR on the ND and on the FMC, but anyway, no I can´t see any navdata issue here. The sequence is correct, the legs are correct … So please report this to the developer of this aircraft, whatever it is …

Thank you,
Richard

Thank you for your reply and your help.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.