EHRD EIDW likely bad route

SimBrief Dispatch
1

TULIP L74 MONIL P1 SUPUR L602 SUPUR L60 PENIL UL28 LELDO M145 BAGSO is being offered as “based on other IFPS-compliant routes”, but the segment SUPUR L602 SUPUR is nonsensical.

That route should be removed, but IMO, the route validator should really reject that sort of construct, too.

Regards,

Tim

2

Thanks Tim, should be fixed now.

Best regards,

3

Yep, although the validator is still happy when I manually enter SUPUR L602 SUPUR when it shouldn’t be. A future version of simBrief should really fix that as well :slight_smile:

Regards,

Tim

4

Also, before I forget; this may be more difficult to investigate, but the route was supposedly “based on other IFPS-compliant routes”, so if possible it may be a good idea to check whether the SUPUR L602 SUPUR segment was actually introduced by the simBrief code that adapted an existing route?

Regards,

Tim

5

Just to clarify, by “fixed” I mean I fixed a bug in the “Based on other IFPS routes” feature. Rather than simply removed the route from the database. :slight_smile:

Regarding the route validator not giving an error, I’ve made a note and will look into it down the road when time permits.

Cheers,

1 Like
6

This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.