TULIP L74 MONIL P1 SUPUR L602 SUPUR L60 PENIL UL28 LELDO M145 BAGSO is being offered as “based on other IFPS-compliant routes”, but the segment
SUPUR L602 SUPUR is nonsensical.
That route should be removed, but IMO, the route validator should really reject that sort of construct, too.
Thanks Tim, should be fixed now.
Yep, although the validator is still happy when I manually enter SUPUR L602 SUPUR when it shouldn’t be. A future version of simBrief should really fix that as well
Also, before I forget; this may be more difficult to investigate, but the route was supposedly “based on other IFPS-compliant routes”, so if possible it may be a good idea to check whether the
SUPUR L602 SUPUR segment was actually introduced by the simBrief code that adapted an existing route?
Just to clarify, by “fixed” I mean I fixed a bug in the “Based on other IFPS routes” feature. Rather than simply removed the route from the database.
Regarding the route validator not giving an error, I’ve made a note and will look into it down the road when time permits.
December 2, 2022, 8:11pm
This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.