With the latest AIRAC installed, the RWY25C of VHHH SIDs disappeared after selecting 25C in the active RTE1 page. However, in the DEP/ARR page, after selecting a different runway with another SID as shown in the pics, the procedure re-appeared.
I contacted PMDG but they said to ask for Navigraph help.
Hi,
Sorry, I may not understand the steps in your screenshots and the logic behind them, my test case:
Route: VHHH/RJTT → Activate → Exec
DEP/ARR button:
Select 25C and PECA1D → Exec
Index button → DEP button again:
Select 07R and PECA3X → Exec
Index button → DEP button again:
Select 07R only:
… and now? I can do these step again and again, but I get no empty SID page as in one of your screenshots. So, I miss something here or I can´t reproduce it.
Cheers,
Richard
That’s the first time I had this issue. From the main RTE page, I type 25C after loading in the flightplan from Simbrief. Executed it then select from DEP/ARR page as normal. However, the 25C SID was completely empty. Then I changed the runway to 07R PECAN3X from DEP/ARR page and excuted. (sometimes by clicking 07R, random runways would have been chosen somehow). I changed back to 25C then it loaded back the procedure.
Ok, so all SIDs are also available for 25C… I have entered the runway now on the RTE page, but the same result. It is possible that it is any key/button combination, but when you see and when you can enter the procedures, the data is working - looks like any logic behind, but I can´t reproduce it, sorry.
I guess it is not navdata related because we “only” offer the data, but not the logic, how, and in which steps you enter it in the FMC. Sorry.
Cheers,
Richard
That’s ok. It’s strange that the issue never happened for me with previous AIRACs. The only work around is to switch 25C from DEP/ARR page.
Hi again,
I have just compared AIRAC 2605 with the current one, and there is no change (at least in the data) between these two cycles at VHHH. The records in the source and also in the database are identical. So, I am not sure what triggers this. I´m sorry.
But thanks for your effort and your explanation …
Cheers,
Richard
