EIDW RNP16 - which is the real FAF?

[Casualclick]

Hi Folks,

I’m trying to figure out what the issue is with the RNP16 approach at Dublin/EIDW.

Per the chart, GARTI is the FAF.

Per the FMS, DW003 is the FAF.

I noted I had no GP indicator approaching GARTI. After passing GARTI, the GP diamond popped up at the BOTTOM of the scale, so I knew we had a mis-match. Then I checked the FMS and the waypoint indicator noted DW003 is the FAF.

[NAVDataOld]

Hi,
I have looked into the database and GARTI is the FAF also in the database, DW003 is a “named stepdown fix” nothing more. That´s also exactly what we offer in our data:

Here a short extraction of the source file:

Sorry, I can´t see any issue in the data.

Cheers,
Richard

[Casualclick]

Thanks Richard. I’ll check with the WT team. This may be a case of waiting out the G3000 refresh.

[Casualclick]

Thanks Richard, please close. Matt confirmed it’s the G3000 in current form reading the last leg as the FAF incorrectly. It’s already fixed in the new version.