# VOR CFA (114.35 ) France absent

**URL:** <https://forum.navigraph.com/t/vor-cfa-114-35-france-absent/23297>\
**Category:** General MSFS Data\
**Created:** [April 27, 2026, 11:56am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/vor-cfa-114-35-france-absent/23297 "2026-04-27T11:56:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerfault](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@Gerfault](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Gerfault)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2026, 11:56am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/vor-cfa-114-35-france-absent/23297/1 "2026-04-27T11:56:43Z")

</div>

Hello  
l’m experience an issue with VOR reception in MSFS 2024 when using Navigraph AIRAC data

Problem :  
The VOR CFA (Clermont-Ferrand, 114.35) does not provide any signal (no ident,no needle  
movement ,no DME) when Navigraph data is installed .

However when l remove or disable Navigraph navdata ,the VOR works normally .

Additional observations :  
The issue is intermittent but happens frequently  
it also affects TIS (Thiers 117.50) when present in the sim  
others VORS (e.g. Limoges ,Roanne work correctly  
same aircraft,same conditions → not an aircraft issue.

test conditions :  
Distance : 10-15 NM from CFA  
Altitude 5000 ft  
NAV 1 correctly tuned (114.35)  
no ident received when the issue occurs

Conclusion:

it seems like a conflict or inconsistency between Navigraph AIRAC data ans MSFS 2024  
navdata for certain VORS

Could you please check if CFA VOR is correctly defined in the current AIRAC ?

Thanks !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2026, 6:54am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/vor-cfa-114-35-france-absent/23297/2 "2026-04-28T06:54:55Z")

</div>

Hi,  
Welcome to Navigraph - I have checked the CFA VORDME in our data, and this navaid is included with 114.35.

I have tested it with the default C172 and the G1000 from LFLC 08, stock scenery, and AIRAC 2604 installed:

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/3X/0/2/0243b26d553d14867f03167659d6f0506d995b0f.jpeg)

You see, I have a signal and also the DME. So, it looks ok at least on the data side - no conflict.

Cheers,  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerfault](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@Gerfault](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Gerfault)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2026, 7:19am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/vor-cfa-114-35-france-absent/23297/3 "2026-04-28T07:19:11Z")

</div>

Thank you for your reply

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/1X/4cc83e90d70ab312b1bd2d7527bddad309607265.png) [@system](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2026, 7:19am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/vor-cfa-114-35-france-absent/23297/4 "2026-04-30T07:19:20Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.