# SPJC charts contradicting/incorrect data

**URL:** <https://forum.navigraph.com/t/spjc-charts-contradicting-incorrect-data/10896>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 26, 2023, 10:55am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/spjc-charts-contradicting-incorrect-data/10896 "2023-01-26T10:55:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheFl4me](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/90db22/32.png) [@TheFl4me](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/TheFl4me)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2023, 10:55am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/spjc-charts-contradicting-incorrect-data/10896/1 "2023-01-26T10:55:55Z")

</div>

Something strange is happening with all the SPJC charts compared to the data.

The charts itself is showing only 1 runway (16), but the data on simbrief (and navigraph itself in the list of available approaches) says there are 2 runway 16L and 16R.

Additionally, the approach charts are contradictory. 1 example for instance is approach chart 11-1: It is named “ILS V RWY16L” in the list of approaches, but when I click on it and open the actual chart/graphic it is marked as “ILS Z RWY 16” on the actual chart.

For the STARs its even worse because the charts are showing completely different STARs than what they are labelled. Example 10-2E labelled “PADIS1 RNAV ARR” is showing the “PEROV4 RNAV ARRIVAL” when opened.

Its almost as if SPJC has gone through some recent changes, and the data has been updated correctly, but the actual images of all the charts are still showing the old data…

I refreshed my browser cache, but that wasn’t the issue.

 ![rwy](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/2/24e54a4c60625c9a91772411b141b10768f88ba3.png)  
 ![arpt](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/f/f49dbfc0d809aab0b87835667fad16efdd5e3956.png)  
 ![ILS](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/1/1799dcacbb773da1db70d55728c383eb373ccf19.jpeg)  
 ![star](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/4/4f4a1c964e1834dc2c0bdf22ce2a9ea9b2a4049b.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skysail](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/skysail/32/304_2.png) [@skysail](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/skysail)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2023, 5:33pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/spjc-charts-contradicting-incorrect-data/10896/2 "2023-12-27T17:33:13Z")

</div>

Hello! Thanks for the feedback and apologies for the very late reply - this post went completely unnoticed by us staff members.

> [@TheFl4me](#):
>
> Its almost as if SPJC has gone through some recent changes, and the data has been updated correctly, but the actual images of all the charts are still showing the old data…

This is probably a good conclusion. I assume that the information about the airport had been updated by the authorities, but that no new charts had yet been issued. This would absolutely cause trouble, and it should be _super_ rare - well spotted! This likely affected real-world pilots as well 😅

As of typing this, however, the issue seems to be resolved. The new runway shows up on the chart, and the procedure charts seem to be correctly linked.

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/3X/1/6/163a781198f4caa1ffc16cf778c75babfc8cdba7.jpeg)

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/3X/2/a/2a6dc671008baaef4c2fc08dddd665ecc30a762a.jpeg)

Thank you for posting this and again - sorry for the late reply!

Kind Regards,  
Malte

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skysail](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/skysail/32/304_2.png) [@skysail](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/skysail)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2023, 5:33pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/spjc-charts-contradicting-incorrect-data/10896/3 "2023-12-27T17:33:18Z")

</div>


