# SB giving turbojet/RNAV arrival for non-RNAV turboprop

**URL:** <https://forum.navigraph.com/t/sb-giving-turbojet-rnav-arrival-for-non-rnav-turboprop/19986>\
**Category:** Aircraft Profiles\
**Created:** [June 20, 2025, 10:19pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/sb-giving-turbojet-rnav-arrival-for-non-rnav-turboprop/19986 "2025-06-20T22:19:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raptor05121](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f475e1/32.png) [@Raptor05121](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Raptor05121)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2025, 10:19pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/sb-giving-turbojet-rnav-arrival-for-non-rnav-turboprop/19986/1 "2025-06-20T22:19:24Z")

</div>

Hello, I am trying to create an airframe profile for the Beechcraft Starship as it was equipped in the 1980s- no GNSS.

No matter how much equipment I remove, to ONLY show VOR navigation, Simbrief is STILL giving me RNAV STARs. Case in point- flight planning from KCLT to KMCO, ICAO equipment S- Standard Equipment (VHF/VOR/ILS) and W- RVSM approved, with NO PBN capability, it still give me the GTOUT1 arrival into KMCO which is TURBOJET ONLY and RNAV.

If you load the 727, which has more PBN and RNAV capability (again without GNSS), it’ll load correctly the VOR to VOR route.

This is my profile if anyone wants to try: [SimBrief - Dispatch](https://dispatch.simbrief.com/airframes/share/575521_1750455157752)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jsokoloff](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/jsokoloff/32/5259_2.png) [@jsokoloff](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/jsokoloff)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2025, 2:01pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/sb-giving-turbojet-rnav-arrival-for-non-rnav-turboprop/19986/2 "2025-06-21T14:01:20Z")

</div>

Hello, thanks for the report. I let the team know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raptor05121](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f475e1/32.png) [@Raptor05121](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Raptor05121)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2025, 2:53pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/sb-giving-turbojet-rnav-arrival-for-non-rnav-turboprop/19986/3 "2025-06-21T14:53:36Z")

</div>

Jason, some more info, I found under PBN capabilities for RW planning:

“D1-D4:  
Required for RNAV SID and STAR procedures. If an RNAV 1 code is not specified, ATC will reject flight plans that include RNAV SID/STAR procedures”

I’ve removed all PBN D-codes so my aircraft should only be legal for en route RNAV, and it is still populating GNSS SIDS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jsokoloff](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/jsokoloff/32/5259_2.png) [@jsokoloff](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/jsokoloff)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2025, 3:09am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/sb-giving-turbojet-rnav-arrival-for-non-rnav-turboprop/19986/4 "2025-06-24T03:09:17Z")

</div>

Okay, we have noted this. Thanks