# RealTraffic integration as an additional traffic data source

**URL:** <https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773>\
**Category:** Wishlist\
**Created:** [November 22, 2024, 10:04pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773 "2024-11-22T22:04:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bindermuehle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@bindermuehle](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/bindermuehle)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2024, 10:04pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/1 "2024-11-22T22:04:56Z")

</div>

With the new capability of showing VATSIM and IVAO traffic in the Navigraph app, many FlyRealTraffic users have asked for showing RealTraffic data as an additional data source. This would allow display of real world air traffic from [www.flyrealtraffic.com](http://www.flyrealtraffic.com) in the Navigraph app.

Navigraph support have indicated they would consider this if a sufficient number of votes are received. So please go ahead and click the “Vote” button above if you would like to see this in the future!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![soucier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ac91a4/32.png) [@soucier](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/soucier)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 6:14am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/2 "2024-11-23T06:14:58Z")

</div>

oui cela serais excellent merci

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kryptovik1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9f8e36/32.png) [@Kryptovik1](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Kryptovik1)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 6:52am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/3 "2024-11-23T06:52:36Z")

</div>

Voted, would love to see this!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jcuellars](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/58f4c7/32.png) [@jcuellars](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/jcuellars)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 7:43am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/4 "2024-11-23T07:43:06Z")

</div>

Absolutely a big YES, will be fantastic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cormoran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c77e96/32.png) [@Cormoran](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Cormoran)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 8:26am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/5 "2024-11-23T08:26:15Z")

</div>

It would be amazing to have RealTraffic on Navigraph! I voted (user Navigraph Unlimited).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarkiMarkBln](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MarkiMarkBln](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/MarkiMarkBln)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 9:27am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/6 "2024-11-23T09:27:00Z")

</div>

A very good idea and above all consistent for those who fly with live traffic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![petefuss](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a88e57/32.png) [@petefuss](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/petefuss)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 11:39am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/7 "2024-11-23T11:39:34Z")

</div>

It`s also a wish from my side

regards Peter

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![freelancer175](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/919ad9/32.png) [@freelancer175](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/freelancer175)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 1:17pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/8 "2024-11-23T13:17:37Z")

</div>

I think this a very good idea

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tonylfi4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/73ab20/32.png) [@tonylfi4](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/tonylfi4)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 1:33pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/9 "2024-11-23T13:33:36Z")

</div>

I concur completely. Seriously important addition to connect RealTraffic, just as it already is with the others. Tony

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wjcronenwett](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/wjcronenwett/32/5904_2.png) [@wjcronenwett](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/wjcronenwett)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 9:42pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/10 "2024-11-23T21:42:30Z")

</div>

I voted, this would be a welcome addition!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ikbenkubi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a9adbd/32.png) [@ikbenkubi](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/ikbenkubi)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2024, 1:46pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/11 "2024-11-24T13:46:45Z")

</div>

We really need this!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ottovolante](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/8c91f0/32.png) [@Ottovolante](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Ottovolante)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2024, 1:50pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/12 "2024-11-24T13:50:34Z")

</div>

Certamente SI!! Sarebbe fantastico. Grazie

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tenhaaf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/4af34b/32.png) [@tenhaaf](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/tenhaaf)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2024, 2:05pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/13 "2024-11-24T14:05:25Z")

</div>

very good idea !! would support the integration

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hakkie\_Airac](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/a88e4f/32.png) [@Hakkie\_Airac](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/Hakkie_Airac)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2024, 4:21pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/14 "2024-11-25T16:21:51Z")

</div>

That is a good suggestion!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cb6663](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c5a1d2/32.png) [@cb6663](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/cb6663)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2024, 8:37pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/15 "2024-11-25T20:37:14Z")

</div>

Oui, une très bonne idée ! 👍

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MSFlyer2020](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@MSFlyer2020](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/MSFlyer2020)\
**Post date:** [November 27, 2024, 3:14pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/16 "2024-11-27T15:14:58Z")

</div>

When are you loading in real traffic data flows as a new feature? I - and I expect many others - would like that very much instead of VATSIM and IVAO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [November 27, 2024, 6:22pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/17 "2024-11-27T18:22:09Z")

</div>

Look at here:

> [@Traffic Sources](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/traffic-sources/17672/2):
>
> Hi, We are considering adding other sources of traffic than VATSIM and IVAO. Kind regards, Stephen

Cheers  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bindermuehle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@bindermuehle](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/bindermuehle)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2024, 1:33am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/18 "2024-11-28T01:33:37Z")

</div>

Don’t forget to vote for this at the top of this thread. Navigraph haven’t yet agreed to implement this and need to see a large number of votes for this to make a case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MSFlyer2020](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@MSFlyer2020](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/MSFlyer2020)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2024, 6:43am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/19 "2024-11-28T06:43:56Z")

</div>

Wouldn’t the colleagues of Flightaware not be a better source to source the real traffic data from?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bindermuehle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@bindermuehle](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/bindermuehle)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2024, 6:27pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773/20 "2024-11-28T18:27:49Z")

</div>

Technically, any service that provides real time air traffic data would work. But [FlyRealTraffic.com](http://FlyRealTraffic.com) is the only service providing real-time and historical air traffic in a form that can be used for injection into your flight simulators. It’s of course ideal if the traffic in your sim matches that in Navigraph. In addition to that, [flyrealtraffic.com](http://flyrealtraffic.com)’s coverage is generally more complete than flightaware’s (or flightradar24’s for that matter).

[Next page](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/realtraffic-integration-as-an-additional-traffic-data-source/17773.md?page=2)
