With the recent su6 released, there have been some fixes/implementations regarding the ils threshold crossing height. A lot of users use navigraph as an alternate source of navigation data(airac cycle).
With these new fixes/implementation, will users also see changes if they use navigraph nav data instead of the default supplied data? Or does navigraph do something completely separate/different?
Hi,
Please can you give us an example of the issue you have exactly with the crossing height? It also depends on the add-ons… so what issue exactly do you have, and where must it be changed?
Thank you very much,
Richard
I’m not neccesarily experiencing an issue, I’m more curious if navigraph nav data users will experience any changes with this update. Or has navigraph already taken care of correct threshold crossing heights on ils approaches itself and does this therefor not have any effect?
Ah, understood. No, we have used our own system long before SU6, so I don’t currently see any reason to change this.
There are still a few issues, even with SU6 and even with the stock data, but it is much better than before; that is correct.
SU6 has a lot of new, good features, and we are working to implement them all. Possibly, we will look at that feature too and decide whether it is better to use it as our own solution.
The next AIRAC does not include any new features from SU6, but we hope we have all implemented and tested with 2610.
Thanks for the question
Richard