# Multiple addon sceneries, priorities and the "double runway" effect

**URL:** https://forum.navigraph.com/t/multiple-addon-sceneries-priorities-and-the-double-runway-effect/2357
**Category:** Airport Scenery
**Tags:** double-runways
**Created:** [December 15, 2020, 2:26pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/multiple-addon-sceneries-priorities-and-the-double-runway-effect/2357 "2020-12-15T14:26:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 35

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![overflow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/848f3c/32.png) [@overflow](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/overflow)
#### Post date: [December 28, 2020, 4:09pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/multiple-addon-sceneries-priorities-and-the-double-runway-effect/2357/35 "2020-12-28T16:09:35Z")

</div>

> [@HowTo - Recommandation for Addon Scenery Designer](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/howto-recommandation-for-addon-scenery-designer/3063/1):
>
> To include terminal-waypoints, terminal-procedures, … is a more or less bad design and should be …

And that annoys me enormously, because you won’t be able to tell me anything about design. Not all users have navdata from you and not all buy them in perspective. So I build in airports, which do not exist in the MSFS stock, very well Approches and all Navdata. Everything else would be bad. Of course I don’t do that if there is a stock airport. And there is also “Delete Airports” in it. Only ETNL and EDAY do not exist in the stock and I have already developed there when nothing was heard from you in MSFS.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/multiple-addon-sceneries-priorities-and-the-double-runway-effect/2357)._