# EDAH - RNP RWY10 Approach

**URL:** <https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391>\
**Category:** Navigraph Hub\
**Created:** [September 29, 2026, 3:30pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391 "2026-09-29T15:30:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heidjer1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/6a8cbe/32.png) [@heidjer1](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/heidjer1)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2026, 3:30pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391/1 "2026-09-29T15:30:53Z")

</div>

I am flying an RNP10 approach at Heringsdorf Airport using the Fenix ​​A319.  
Everything is working well except for the vertical guidance. The glide path only captures about 2 NM past the BUGAH descent point.  
What could be the problem?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 2:13am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391/2 "2026-09-30T02:13:21Z")

</div>

Hi,  
Thanks for contacting us.

First question, can you reproduce this with any stock aircraft (like the C172 with the G1000) too?

Second, have you installed any 3rd-party packages or scenery, excluding ours?

Cheers  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heidjer1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/6a8cbe/32.png) [@heidjer1](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/heidjer1)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2026, 5:10pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391/3 "2026-10-01T17:10:41Z")

</div>

Hi Richard,

I’ve run a few tests:

The RNP approach to RWY10 works with the C172 (G1000).

With the Fenix ​​(A319, A320), the descent from 3,000 ft begins much too late and proceeds at a rate of approximately 1,200 ft/min.

It makes no difference whether third-party scenery is installed or not.

There are no issues with the RNP approach to RWY28; the descent point is set correctly there.

Do you have any other ideas?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

**Hans-Jürgen Brandt**

Bremer Straße 70 | 21244 Buchholz

t +49 4181 32196 | m +49 152 53188578

[HJBrandt@gmx.de](mailto:HJBrandt@gmx.de)

> **(attachments)**
>
> ![Screenshot 2026-09-30 213931_a.jpg](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/3X/3/0/3074a37ab1468b09b699fe590802f169e4258902.jpeg)  
> ![Screenshot 2026-09-30 214106_a.jpg](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/3X/9/f/9fea3f624f96adf907f749af1480767116befa2f.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2026, 6:03pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391/4 "2026-10-01T18:03:17Z")

</div>

Servus Hans-Jürgen,  
I have checked the Fenix database, and the values there are OK so far and match MSFS. I know that Fenix uses its own algorithm to calculate LOC/GS, so there is a possibility of an issue. I would highly recommend reporting this to Fenix; it appears to be more of an issue with their systems. I´m sorry …

Cheers,  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/1X/4cc83e90d70ab312b1bd2d7527bddad309607265.png) [@system](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2026, 6:03pm UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/edah-rnp-rwy10-approach/24391/5 "2026-10-08T18:03:40Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.