# Duplicate Runway at Kai Tak VHHX

**URL:** <https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277>\
**Category:** Airport Scenery\
**Created:** [February 25, 2023, 9:37am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277 "2023-02-25T09:37:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![faycheung](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/faycheung/32/438_2.png) [@faycheung](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/faycheung)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 9:37am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/1 "2023-02-25T09:37:48Z")

</div>

Hello. The runway is duplicated at VHHX Kai Tak again with Asobo/Gaya’s SU11 version. Unsure if due latest AIRAC or WU12. Evident in 2 separate systems.

The package priority seems correct, scenery is at priority 0 and Navigraph navdata base and navdata has priorities 2 and 3 respectively. Upon removal of Navigraph packages, duplicate is also removed.

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/9/983d0d7f0776df4d7e3e2ea01d7c9a4b54987811.jpeg)  
 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/2/2efa7617bb827a371f65291ce41e3df4182ae15a.jpeg)  
 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/2/2b3a73f1c37adfea2716200400a115a1a7b79ba7.jpeg)

Edit: Clarified priority and package names

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 10:01am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/2 "2023-02-25T10:01:06Z")

</div>

Hi,  
please upload your `content.xml` file here … because normally this is not correct ordering.

- Can you confirm, that you´re using Navigraph Navdata Center v1.12?
- Have you manual changed/added any entries in the content.xml file or have you used the ordering-tool in MSFS?

Thank you,  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![faycheung](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/faycheung/32/438_2.png) [@faycheung](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/faycheung)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 10:18am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/3 "2023-02-25T10:18:17Z")

</div>

Hi Richard,  
I do apologise, I neglected to check content.xml as well before posting here.

> - Can you confirm, that you´re using Navigraph Navdata Center v1.12?

I am using 1.0.12. I have downloaded the Navdata Center again from the downloads page and still shows 1.0.12

> - Have you manual changed/added any entries in the content.xml file or have you used the ordering-tool in MSFS?

I have not made any changes to either. I was only viewing the ordering-tool in MSFS to view the priority.

[Content.xml](https://forum.navigraph.com/uploads/short-url/apyCwoUZVFN6lNNZLTmWaI3fVzC.xml) (234 Bytes)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 10:46am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/4 "2023-02-25T10:46:24Z")

</div>

No probs - thanks for the file - it´s correct and also the version of the NNC is correct 1.0.12 not 1.12, sorry for the confusion.

I have identified the issue now and will create a second revision of the 2302 cycle. Please standby - I will inform you here, when it´s uploaded and ready to re-install it. It´s an easy fix, sorry for the troubles.

Cheers  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![faycheung](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/faycheung/32/438_2.png) [@faycheung](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/faycheung)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 11:21am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/5 "2023-02-25T11:21:51Z")

</div>

Not a problem at all. Thank you very much for your help.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NAVData](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.navigraph.com/navdata/32/30549_2.png) [@NAVData](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/NAVData)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 11:44am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/6 "2023-02-25T11:44:10Z")

</div>

Revision 2 is now online. Please open the Navigraph Navdata Center and press on the update button on the AIRAC 2302 rev. 2 line … this version should fix this double runway-issue at VHHX.

AIRAC 2302 rev.2:

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/2X/b/b6a096acc94f9626553554af500f6f03d03a18dc.jpeg)

Thanks for the report and have a nice weekend,  
Richard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/navigraph1/original/1X/4cc83e90d70ab312b1bd2d7527bddad309607265.png) [@system](https://forum.navigraph.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2023, 11:44am UTC](https://forum.navigraph.com/t/duplicate-runway-at-kai-tak-vhhx/11277/7 "2023-02-27T11:44:37Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
